Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 01:13
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Muon g-2 announces most precise measurement of the magnetic anomaly of the muon - Fermilab (.gov)
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
What’s next?
Early Humans Did More Than Just Walk—They Mastered a Surprising Skill Set - Indian Defence Review
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
What was your wildest experience as a lesbian?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Something Really Strange Happens When I Orgasm. Make It Stop. - Slate Magazine
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Just in the last 5 years:
Why does my crush make me jealous about having a girlfriend?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Thank you.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Royal Caribbean crew members shares onboard secrets - TheStreet